Over 59422
politifake

Inconvenient Politics


INCONVENIENT TRUTH- AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE -




A VERY INCONVENIENT TRUTH - OOPS, It Wasn't Bush's Fault After All




Al Gore goes green -


TAGS: al gore inconvenient lie
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 8:27 pm
and thats the exact f***ing opposite of what the australian government is doing, which is cutting funding for research and making it more expensive for people to get a higher education. obama may be a statist, but at least he appreciates science.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 8:24 pm
the answer is to fund research into new energy sources, and bring the price of them down below that of coal. once that happens, the entire planet will adopt those energy sources eagerly.
OTC - May 23, 2014, 4:35 pm
At least Australia is cutting funds for global warming by 90%
fauxnews - May 23, 2014, 4:27 pm
If you actually believed there is enough proof that a 2000 yr old hippie zombie once walked on water and returned from the dead after being crucifixed, then get over yourself...man-made climate change is not that much more far-fletched. Smarten up people.
fauxnews - May 23, 2014, 4:23 pm
It's simple. FACT: CO2 stays in the atmosphere for a VERY long time and traps heat. Human activity that add EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS of CO2 into the natural cyclical mix of CO2 will add to this effect, making the Earth h**ter,which studies have shown empirically
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 4:05 pm
Why don't you take the initiative, and show us how, fox. =)
foxrecon19d - May 23, 2014, 3:46 pm
Obviously, the only answer for to the problem of man-made CO2 production is for these hypocrite left-wing liberals to hold their breath until the earth heals itself. Every breath they take whining about global warming only makes the problem worse
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:35 pm
aye, it was good. we should take it to the forums later, where we arent limited to 255 letter responses.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:33 pm
that is why we can say with an extremely high degree of certainty what the ratio of gases was in the atmosphere hundreds of thousands of years ago. the bubbles are trapped, nothing can get in and nothing can get out.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:29 pm
gas composition in the atmosphere is pretty much the same everywhere, because the individual molecules bouncing around at over 700 miles per hour. chemistry is well understood, we know more about chemistry than we know about everything else put together.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:27 pm
I enjoyed this discussion, but I have to get back to work, lunch time is over. Later.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:25 pm
a millionare's "cash climate" depends almost soley upon his investments, and paid work is almost completely meaningless, but to the person living paycheck to paycheck, investments are irrelevant and dollars per hour is everything. thats the best a***ogy.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:25 pm
and, by the same token, we can only see gases in ice cores as it pertains to the area where the ice cores are taken. How do we know what caused any of the gases that were trapped there? Was there a local event? Was it global? Speculation again.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:23 pm
think science. its not magic, there has to be a specific mechanism by which infomation can be preserved. we can measure ratios of gases in ice cores, we CANT directly measure solar output 600 years ago, we can only infer it based on secondary information
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:22 pm
notice the fluctuations just over that period of time?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:21 pm
For solar activity, here's 1750 to present: http://www.ips.gov.au/Images/Educational/The%20Sun%20and%20Solar%20Activity/Solar%20Cycle/Solar%20Cycles%201%20-%2023.gif
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:20 pm
think of it this way, a pay increase of 10$ per hour doesnt mean **** to a millionare, but it means everything to someone earning 1$ per hour. solar changes affect mars because mars is "poor" and has almost no atmosphere.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:19 pm
Think Pompei. It's not hard to figure out what happened there and that was over 600 years ago.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:18 pm
but what we DO have is accurate records of carbon dioxide levels going back millions of years, thanks to trapped air in glaciers and polar icecaps. solar output doesnt mean ****.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:14 pm
"and a large number of volcanic eruptions" you mean volcanoes? that spray sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere which reflects solar energy back into space?... i dispute the notion that we have any valid way of determining solar output 600 years ago.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:14 pm
...affects this ratio, it is impossible to not make the correlation that pollution is having an effect on these cycles.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:13 pm
Not disagreeing with the a**ertion that Earth has natural cycles. I'm saying that these cycles are affected by several factors. One of these factors just happens to be the ratio of CO2 in the atmosphere. Seeing as how human activity directly...
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:13 pm
Between 1350 and 1850, the earth went thru a global cooling due to a TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT and a large number of volcanic eruptions.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:12 pm
true... i just get really pissed off when the topic of carbon taxes comes up, because of how much bull**** and uncertainty it has caused in my country. things would be so much f***ing better if there was never a carbon tax.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:11 pm
I don't think 20% is insignificant at all. Maybe that's just me though.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:11 pm
for example, between 900 and 1300, the earth experienced a prolonged period of global warming. The scientists blame it on a TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:08 pm
*rains*
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:07 pm
I disagree. The earth's climate changes over longer periods of time. That's why we have had ice ages (mini and major) and years of severe droughts and years of torrential rais over the life span of the earth.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:07 pm
ill tell you what caused it, A TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT. mars's climate is extremely unstable, EARTHS IS NOT. to change the earth's climate, you have to f*** with the composition of its atmosphere.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:06 pm
I'm just saying that it's not 'absolutely none'.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:05 pm
Mature forests take in CO2 and produce oxygen, but give off about the same in CO2 when old trees die.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:05 pm
again, earth's climate is self regulating, mars's climate is much more unstable. mars's climate shifts wildly over the span of a few decades, whereas the earths is virtually unchanging in comparison.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:02 pm
You do understand that the 'ice' on Mars is actually frozen CO2, and not frozen H2O, yes?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:01 pm
what caused mars to suddenly lose it's ice caps over that 10 year period. The amount of CO2 didn't change.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:01 pm
its ignored because it really doesnt have much of an effect. the vast majority of biomass on earth is in the oceans, and something like 80% of our oxygen comes from ocean dwelling phytoplankton and plants.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:00 pm
There are huge sections of forest around the world that are being destroyed to create charcoal to heat homes. Trees consume CO2 and produce Oxygen. So, yes, I see man's contribution to the increase, but that still leaves the mystery of mars polar ice melt
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:59 pm
there is no f***ing way that is worth massive cuts to science funding, massive increases to university tuition, and a government soely concerned with controlling the media and making it easier for rupert murdoch to attain a media monopoly.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:57 pm
An often ignored factor, in the debate, is deforestation. In the last 100 years, the worlds forests have shrunk dramatically. (some estimates say 50%)
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:56 pm
when we burn carbon dug up from the ground, we are increasing the amount of carbon in the carbon cycle, it takes millions of years for that carbon to be resequestered in geological deposits.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:55 pm
I'm not sure about your 'absolutely none' opinion. There's several reports online stating the opposite. Specifically a drop in pollution of 13% in the electricity sector alone.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:53 pm
and I believe we are at a whopping 0.4% carbon dioxide. Yet our polar ice is melting just like the polar ice is melting on mars.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:52 pm
yes, because the earth has a self-regulating system due to the massive quantities of liquid water on the surface. the problem with a self regulating system is if you change the ratio of gases in the atmosphere, it has dramatic effects upon heat absorbance
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
and we are still a far cry away from 95.7% carbon dioxide in our atmosphere.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
so, solar energy, from the same sun that we have, made the changes on mars, but had little or no effect on earth?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
the reason CO2 matters on earth isnt because we burn it, its because we're digging it up from geological deposits which have been isolated from the carbon cycle for hundreds of millions of years.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:50 pm
changes in solar energy output resulting in climate shifts. mars has no oceans or life to regulate the climate like on earth, mars' is very unstable.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:49 pm
that means that the USA could learn from Australia, but it won't
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:49 pm
And CO2 reflects heat, or traps it, Emma?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:48 pm
absolutely none. since 2013, "supporting a carbon tax" has been the top of the list of "stupidest f***ing things ever", just ahead of "cleaning a loaded gun while pointing it at your face" and "leaving loaded guns around young kids unsup***ised"
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:48 pm
and the correct figure is 95.7% carbon dioxide and 2.7% nitrogen
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:46 pm
and how did man contribute to that? Did the carbon dioxide just mysteriously appear in 1995?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:46 pm
thats actually pretty funny, because you just got f***ing owned. the score is now 1:1. mars's atmosphere is 99% carbon dioxide.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:45 pm
what effect did the carbon tax have on pollution?
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:43 pm
I don't hate republicans TA.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:41 pm
and f***ING NOTHING is worth that price. our prime minister does whatever the f*** rupert murdoch tells him to do, and yes, its THAT rupert murdoch, the guy who OWNS FOX NEWS. you have no idea how much worse things could be. beware the carbon tax.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:37 pm
our "leftie" government brought in a carbon tax a year before the election, and they got completely destroyed in the polls. australia is now run by a complete f***wit. that is the price of a carbon tax, it turns your government conservative.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:36 pm
i completely disagree with everything you just said. you're smart, but you let your hate for republicans cloud your judgement. my opposition to carbon taxes has nothing to do with ideology, and everything to do with experiencing a carbon tax in australia
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:18 pm
Answer the three questions in 66862, and you'll have the answer to your own question Emma.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:15 pm
Seeing as how you know everything about climate change, clown, how about explaining why mars is going thru climate change without the presence of man
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:14 pm
Seeing as how you know everything Emma, A) what's Mars' atmosphere comprised of, mainly? B) what's it's density in relation to earth's atmosphere? C) What effect do these differences create vis-a-vis the effect of the sun on the individual planets?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:11 pm
on mars than earth.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:10 pm
Uh, I hate to break it to you clown, but the polar ice caps are melting without human intervention or pollution. And it looks like it's happening at a faster rate.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 1:49 pm
Most conservatives are only concerned about money. A carbon tax is the only incentive that they'll understand. IMO.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 1:45 pm
Um, hate to break it to you Emma, but there aren't any people living on Mars yet. However, if we did, and we were pumping trillions of tonnes of CO2 into Mars' atmosphere every year, the answer to that question would be; 'a noticeable affect.'
OTC - May 23, 2014, 7:55 am
Those man-made land rovers we sent there, now liberals will have come up with another tax to stop that too
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 1:32 am
Climate change on Mars is real as well and mimics the changes on earth. What effect does man made pollution on earth have on Mars?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 1:04 am
I.E. climate change is real, but that doesnt mean a carbon tax is a good idea. a carbon tax is among the most f***ing retarded ideas in human history, you dont have to deny climate change to oppose f***tarded government interference in the economy.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 1:03 am
"something i dont understand is being used to justify policies i dont understand! it must be a CONSPIRACY!". you cant fight ultra-lefty f***tards by denying the truth, you fight them by pointing out how retarded their solutions are.
EmmaRoydes - May 22, 2014, 6:15 pm
New book by Al Gore: "Pimp My Planet"


Albert Gore -




The Father of Global Warming -




The Father of Global Warming -




An Inconvenient Truth -




Global Warming Hysterian -


TAGS: al gore global warming hysterian climate change hoax scam fraud green religion greenies alarmists warmists ipcc inconvenient truth eco fascism junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 3, 2015, 11:49 pm
There's a reason I call Gore The Profit of Global Warming. He made a lot of dough off the hysteria he spreads, but that doesn't make the theory itself invalid.


An Inconvenient Truth -




By Hook or by Crook -




liberal reality deniers -




PREV PAGE